• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Vault Project

Where Secrets Surface

  • U.S. News
  • Health & Science
  • Government Oversight
  • Elections & Law
  • The Surveillance State
    • Censorship
  • World News
  • The Vault Files
  • About
  • Contact Us

Can my employer request additional information about my “sincerely held religious beliefs?”

November 23, 2021 by Megan Redshaw

According to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), under Title VII, “an employer should assume that a request for religious accommodation is based on sincerely held religious beliefs.  However, if an employer has an objective basis for questioning either the religious nature or the sincerity of a particular belief, the employer would be justified in making a limited factual inquiry and seeking additional supporting information.”

When an employer requests additional information, “employees should provide information that addresses the employer’s reasonable doubts. That information need not, however, take any specific form.”
 
The EEOC says written materials or the employee’s personal first-hand explanation may be sufficient to alleviate the employer’s doubts about the sincerity or religious nature of the employee’s professed belief such that third-party verification is unnecessary.  In addition, since individual beliefs can be sincerely held and religious, even when third-party verification is requested, it does not have to come from a clergy member or fellow congregant, but rather could be provided by others who are aware of the employee’s religious practice or belief.

If an employee fails to cooperate with an employer’s reasonable request for verification of the sincerity or religious nature of a professed belief, he/she risks losing any subsequent claim that the employer improperly denied an accommodation.  However, if an employer unreasonably requests unnecessary or excessive corroborating evidence they risk being held liable for denying a reasonable accommodation request, and their actions could be challenged as retaliatory or as part of a pattern of harassment.

Tweet
Share
Share
Pin

Primary Sidebar

Email Newsletter

Sign up to receive updates from The Vault Project.

Records Show Epstein and Gates Were Involved in Pandemic-Related Discussions Years Before COVID

Medical Establishment Reverses Course on Gender Surgeries for Minors

Federal Lawmakers Urge DOJ to Investigate States Over Religious Vaccine Exemptions

Jury Hits New York Gender Clinicians with $2 Million Malpractice Verdict in Landmark Detransitioner Case

U.S. Cuts Ties With World Health Organization After COVID-Era Failures

Vaccine Makers Lash Out at RFK Jr. as Sales Slide, Pfizer CEO ‘Seriously Frustrated’

Texas Launches Landmark Investigation Into Unlawful Financial Incentives Tied to Vaccines

New Review: COVID Vaccines Linked to Several Types of Cancer

Federal Judge Allows American Academy of Pediatrics to Sue RFK Jr. Over Vaccine Policy Changes

RFK Jr. Issues New Dietary Guidelines That Are Actually Healthy

HHS Cuts Childhood Vaccine Schedule, Brings U.S. in Line With Peer Nations

U.S. Captures Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in Overnight Military Operation

Footer

Disclaimer and Disclosures

The Vault Project is a website for informational and educational purposes only. To learn more, please visit our disclaimer and disclosures page.

Privacy Policy

Our team is dedicated to protecting your privacy. Should you have any questions about how we use your data, please read our  privacy policy.

Contact Us

Do you have a question or comment for The Vault Project? You can email us at info@thevaultproject.org or visit our contact page.