WHO Pushing Ahead on Plans to Obtain Global Control of Sovereign Nations Despite Major Setback

The Biden Administration suffered a stunning defeat at the 75th World Health Assembly held in Geneva from May 22 through May 27, when nations banned together and declared they would not give up their country’s sovereignty to sign on to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) corrupt globalist agenda.

These countries include Brazil, Brunei, Namibia, Bangladesh, Russia, India, China, South Africa and Iran — with Brazil saying it would exit the WHO entirely before it would subject its population to the new amendments.

Meanwhile, official delegates from wealthy developed nations like Australia, the UK, European Union and the U.S. strongly urged other member states to sign on to the Biden Administration’s proposed amendments to the 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR).

The IHR is the most important treaty regulating global health and pandemic preparedness. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) describes the IHR as “legally binding.”

The 13 amendments to the IHR were quietly proposed in January by the Biden Administration’s HHS Assistant Secretary for Global Affairs and had the support of almost 50 other governments.

The Biden Administration’s amendments would have essentially transferred the sovereignty of the U.S. and other nations to the WHO, effectively creating a One World Government.

Among other changes, the amendments would have further empowered the WHO and its director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus to declare international health emergencies without the approval of the affected nation or government.

Although the WHO is focused on health issues, experts are concerned about the possibility that anything from climate change to gun violence could be deemed a “public health emergency” placing it under the expanded purview of the WHO.

WHO unable to reach consensus on proposed amendments

On May 20, a document filed in a UK court case revealed the WHO’s Working Group on Pandemic Response was “unable to reach consensus” regarding the amendments.

Just four days later on May 24, a new set of replacement amendments were submitted to the 75th World Health Assembly in violation of Article 55 of the IHR — which requires amendments to be submitted at last 4 months in advance of the World Health Assembly.

The replacement amendments were revised and published on May 27 by the WHO. The newly revised amendments mainly did one thing — strengthened each nation’s ability to express their “reservations” to any future amendments.

WHO remains a major threat to U.S sovereignty

Despite this victory, the WHO remains a major threat to U.S. sovereignty and is moving ahead with plans to implement far-reaching amendments to global rules that will be submitted in September.

In addition, WHO leaders are developing an “international pandemic treaty,” which some argue will hand over unprecedented powers to the WHO and impose medical tyranny on humanity.

The U.S. State Department and WHO officials insist the goal of the pandemic treaty is to “empower the organization to fight global health crises.” But the WHO is already experiencing pushback from U.S. state and federal lawmakers.

“This is just another major totalitarian power grab by the CDC, the WHO, Bill Gates, Big Pharma, the Biowarfare Industry, the People’s Republic of China and others to impose their medical tyranny upon the human race,” Francis Boyle, Professor of International Law at the University of Illinois told The Epoch Times.

Boyle, who wrote the 1989 legislation implementing the Biological Weapons Convention unanimously approved by Congress, said WHO’s power grab needs to be opposed “at all costs,” and suggested U.S. lawmakers come together to stop it now.

Boyle is urging senators to create and circulate a letter expressing their intent to reject any new WHO pandemic treaty that may be presented to them for ratification.

“Assuming you can get 34 senators to sign that Circular Letter, that would make the Pandemic Treaty Dead on Arrival here in the United States on its face alone,” Boyle said. “That then might kill off this WHO Pandemic Treaty in its infancy when next the [World Health Assembly] meets to consider it.”

WHO is a “criminal organization” that is “completely rotten, corrupt and despicable,” Boyle said. “It is nothing more than a front organization for Pharma, the biowarfare industry and Gates.”

The international law professor also argued leading WHO officials should be considered for potential prosecution for crimes against humanity, noting the WHO’s sponsorship of the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the agency’s role in promoting the COVID-19 “frankenshots.”