World Health Organization Attempts to Take Control of Pandemic Response in Major ‘Global Treaty’ Power Grab

World Health Organization to Take Control of Pandemic Response in Major Power Grab

There’s something sinister playing out behind the scenes at the World Health Organization (WHO) and many people haven’t a clue. The WHO is attempting to form a new global pandemic treaty that would grant it absolute power over global biosecurity, such as the power to declare a pandemic, implement vaccine passports and mandatory vaccinations, surveil citizens, initiate lockdowns, impose travel restrictions and standardize medical care.

In essence, the WHO is using “biosecurity” — which focuses on preventing the introduction or harmful spread of viruses or bacteria to humans and animals — as an excuse to usher in a New World Order or other initiatives that violate our individual liberties and constitutional rights.

“As you know, in December the World Health Assembly made the historic decision to negotiate a WHO convention, agreement or other international instrument to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response,” said Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the WHO, during the first round of public hearings in April.

Ghebreyesus said he thinks the agreement will be a “gamechanger,” adding an “Intergovernmental Negotiating Body — an INB — has now been established and has begun its work.”

If implemented, member states who sign on to this global agenda would be bound by international agreement to do whatever the WHO wants — and we would not be able to challenge vaccine mandates, lockdowns, forced face-masking or other measures through individual states and the judicial system.

All the initiative needs to become binding on U.S. citizens is a successful 2/3 vote in the U.S. Senate and a signature by the President, which is why the upcoming mid-term election is so important. Biden has already signified his support for the treaty, which is not surprising considering it’s a workaround for getting his failed COVID-19 measures pushed upon U.S. citizens.

Essentially, this global treaty would take the power given by the framers of the U.S. Constitution to the states (and by extension…the people) and place it comfortably in the hands of the donors to the WHO, like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Chinese Communist Party.

The INB will hold its next meeting by Aug. 1, 2022, to discuss progress on a working draft. It will deliver a progress report to the 76th World Health Assembly in 2023 and a completed draft treaty will be submitted to the World Health Assembly in 2024. The treaty will “affect everyone,” Ghebreyesus said.

The World Health Assembly, which “governs the WHO,” will also vote on amendments to the International Health Regulations during its meeting in May — which could also strip away more individual rights and liberties — and will allow two more days of public comment on the treaty on June 16 and 17.

According to independent journalist James Corbett, the WHO is using the COVID-19 pandemic as an excuse to usher in a global agenda.

“Make no mistake, the WHO pandemic treaty is a direct attack on the sovereignty of its member states, as well as a direct attack on your bodily autonomy,” Corbett said during an episode of “The Corbett Report,” where he explained the details of the treaty.

“The WHO is not qualified to make global health decisions,” Dr. Joseph Mercola wrote in a recent article on the treaty. “As just one example, the WHO didn’t publicly admit SARS-CoV-2 was airborne until the end of December 2021, yet scientists knew the virus was airborne within weeks of the pandemic being declared. The WHO also ignored early advice about airborne transmission.”

Mercola said a one-size-fits-all approach to pandemic response won’t work because pandemic threats are not identical in all parts of the world, nor will people necessarily benefit from identical treatment.

“The globalists that brought us the wildly exaggerated COVID pandemic in an effort to cement a biosecurity grid into place are now hard at work on the next phase of this New World Order,” Mercola wrote, adding there isn’t a valid justification for “handing over more power to the WHO, especially in light of its many inexplicable mistakes in this and previous pandemics.”

Mercola the effort to hand more power over to the WHO is about “something other than them being the most qualified to make health decisions that benefit and protect everyone.” The WHO is likely being installed as a “de facto governing body” for the global deep state, he said.

Mercola explained:

“Through the WHO, under the guise of biosecurity, the globalist cabal who seek to own everything and control everyone will then be able to implement their wishes across the whole world in one fell swoop. With this treaty in place, all member nations will be subject to the WHO’s dictates.

“If the WHO says every person on the planet needs to have a vaccine passport and digital identity to ensure vaccination compliance, then that’s what every country will be forced to implement, even if the people have rejected such plans using local democratic processes […].

“Under the guise of a global pandemic, the WHO, the World Economic Forum and all its installed leaders in government and private business were able to roll out a plan that had already been decades in the making. The pandemic was a perfect cover.

“In the name of keeping everyone “safe” from infection, the globalists justified unprecedented attacks on democracy, civil liberties and personal freedoms, including the right to choose your own medical treatment.

“Now, the WHO is gearing up to make its pandemic leadership permanent, extend it into the healthcare systems of every nation and eventually implement a universal or “socialist-like” healthcare system as part of The Great Reset.”

Maajid Nawaz, a well-known anti-extremism activist in an April 28 Tweet said the “WHO pandemic treaty serves as a backdoor to global empire.”

The WHO has a very broad definition of “pandemic”

Although the WHO used to specify that a pandemic was a severe illness that causes high morbidity, it changed its definition of “pandemic” several years ago to a “worldwide epidemic of a disease,” which is a very broad criterion that could encompass any number of diseases with or without severe illness or high morbidity.

According to WebMD, the WHO declared COVID-19 to be a pandemic when it “became clear that the illness was severe and that it was spreading quickly over a wide area.” The WHO’s current “pandemic alert system” has nothing to do with disease severity and everything to do with disease spread.

“The whole premise behind this pandemic treaty is that shared threat requires shared response, but a given threat is almost never equally shared across regions,” Mercola said.

“Take COVID-19 for example. Not only is the risk of COVID not the same for people in New York City and the outback of Australia, it’s not even the same for all the people in those areas, as COVID is highly dependent on age and underlying health conditions.”

Mercola said the WHO intends to eliminate individualized medicine and “provide blanket rulings for how a given threat should be addressed.” This, he says, will “result in needless suffering, not to mention the loss of individual freedom.”

It is no secret that Ghebreyesus is pro-universal health care. When elected as the WHO’s Director-General in 2017, he stated during his victory speech to health ministers that his “central priority” was universal health coverage.

The WHO has an awful track record when it comes to public health initiatives and pandemics, Mercola said. There was the fake H1N1 swine flu pandemic in 2019, the “inconsequential Zika outbreak” in 2016, the overly-hyped Ebola outbreak in 2019 and the massively exaggerated COVID pandemic in 2020.

“The WHO has already been significantly empowered to dictate global health policy with regard to pandemics, and they used that power to bamboozle the nations of the world into spending billions of dollars on countermeasures, especially drugs and vaccines, that didn’t work very well,” he explained. “The WHO is really just another wealth-transfer instrument. The WHO’s Big Pharma collaborators make billions on the taxpayers’ dime, while the people of the world are left to suffer the consequences of fast-tracked vaccines.”

Although the first public comment session on the treaty ended on April 13, 2022. The WHO said it will allow two more days of public comment on June 16 and 17, although the details for submission have not been announced.

To block the International Health Resolution amendments at the May 2022 World Health Assembly, you can contact your respective delegations with opposition. In addition, the World Council for Health is a great resource providing updates and guidance regarding the WHO’s global treaty.